Dr Schrader continues her series debunking common misconceptions about the
Middle Ages with a look at the notion that the medieval Church was
bigoted and hostile to inquiry, study and scholarship.
Clerical ignorance and bigotry is another popular theme in films and novels set in the Middle Ages. The Kingdom of Heaven
comes readily to mind, from the evil priest in the opening scenes
denying a woman burial to the Knights Templar transformed into mindless
brutes, but it is by no means the exception. I could site at least a
dozen modern novels in which clerics play the role of mindless fanatics,
usually opposed to tolerance, compromise, and pure common sense -- but I
don't want to be accused of bad-mouthing the competition so I
won't list the titles here.
Of
course, it is impossible to deny that the Inquisition was an
institution established in the 13th century or that individual priests,
monks and friars may indeed have been uneducated and fanatical.
Certainly the ignorance of many parish priests was a scandal that fueled
Luther's anger and led to the Reformation. But Luther was not the
first monk to bemoan the ignorance of his fellows and there had been
many previous attempts to increase the standards of education for the
parish priest.
Yet,
despite the above, it is nevertheless historically inaccurate to
suggest that the Catholic Church as an institution was governed by
bigotry and superstition or that it was inherently opposed to study,
scholarship, and scientific inquiry.
Let's
start with the simple fact that the Church, notably monasteries and
nunneries, were the most effective centers for the preservation of
classical literature and thought in the period immediately following the
"fall" of the Roman Empire. This was especially so in the Eastern Roman
Empire where monasteries were not immediately threatened, but more important in
the West where they were. It is important to understand that it was in
these religious institutions that the teachings not only of Christ but
of Aristotle and Plato were preserved, copied, read, studied and
analyzed.
Monasteries
continued to be centers of learning -- not rote learning as in the
Koran schools familiar across the world today -- but as centers of
inquiry and study, even after the political situation had stabilized. By
the 11th century they were very much centers of intellectual inquiry
and debate. Peter Abelard (unfortunately more famous for his affair with
Heloise than for his philosophy) is just one example of a critical
thinker as a theologian, philosopher and logician. Hildegard von Bingen
is, of course, another example from the same century. She wrote
treatises on medicine and natural history characterized by a high
quality of scientific observation. Later scholars of note included Roger
Bacon and Thomas Aquinas.
Indeed,
the very concept of universities - places dedicated to learning and
debate protected by the notion of academic freedom -- evolved out of the
Cathedral schools of the Middle Ages. Pope Gregory VII in a papal
decree from 1079 regulated Cathedral schools and is credited with
thereby providing the framework for independent universities. The first
such university was established just nine years later in 1088 at
Bologna, Italy. It was followed by the University of Paris in 1150 and
the University of Oxford in 1167.
The
learning taught in these universities was not confined to scripture.
On the contrary, study of ancient Greek and Roman texts was an essential
component of medieval higher education. It is a fallacy -- but a
frequently repeated and propagated one -- that knowledge of classical
texts were "re-discovered" in the Renaissance after such knowledge was
"preserved" by the Muslims. This is nonsense. The University of Bologna at its inception was focused on teaching Roman law -- that is ancient Roman
not canon law! The principal sources used for teaching medicine in
medieval universities were Hippocrates, Galen and Avicenna. Aristotle
and Plato were hotly debated in studies of law, politics, logic, and
philosophy. Universities
also provided study of mathematics and the natural sciences, based
largely on classical but also Byzantine and even Muslim scholars. The
university culture at this time, furthermore, was based on debates,
disputations, and the requirement to read extensively in order to pass
examinations, which entailed defending ones ideas before a panel of
established scholars. The concept of "peer review" and defense of a
doctrinal dissertation today is based on this medieval tradition.
Just
one small example, the knowledge that the earth was a sphere was
widespread in intellectual circles in the Middle Ages. In the 6th
century, for example, Bishop Isidore of Seville included the fact that
the earth was round in his encyclopedia. The Venerable Bede writing
roughly a century later described the earth as an "orb" at the center of
the universe. Hildegard von Bingen writing the 11th century described
the earth as a sphere, no less than did Dante's Divine Comedy written in
the 14th century. Galileo was condemned NOT in the Middle Ages, but in
the so-called Renaissance; furthermore, he was condemned not for saying the earth was round, but rather that the earth revolved around the sun rather than the reverse.
This brings us to the fact that fundamentalism,
the belief that all knowledge is contained in scripture, is inherently
more bigoted and anti-science than was the medieval church. It was the
Reformation, with its emphasis on the Bible -- and the Bible alone --
that bred religious bigotry in the West. Likewise it is Islamic
fundamentalism, not enlightened Islam, that poses a threat to peaceful
co-existence between peoples holding different religious beliefs to this
day.
For
readers tired of clichés and cartoons, award-winning novelist Helena P.
Schrader offers nuanced insight into historical events and figures
based on sound research and an understanding of human nature. Her
complex and engaging characters bring history back to life as a means to
better understand ourselves.
Find out more at: https://www.helenapschrader.com/crusades.html
great article, bringing some balance and skepticism to the usual tropes.
ReplyDelete